SAYING WHAT HAS TO BE SAID...IN TRUE LIBERTARIAN FASHION
[This post first appeared on The Phalanx in March 2005, we are re-posting it because of its relavancy, given recent grumblings about poverty in America]
According to a UN study on child poverty, the United States has one of the highest child poverty rates among the world’s wealthiest countries. At first glance this would appear alarming and embarrassing, but then one reads the study and comes to a very different conclusion. According to the study 22% of Americans under the age of 18 live in “relative” poverty. Relative poverty is just that, relative. The UN, however, defines poverty as earning less than 50% of the median income in that country. So for example if the median income in Country X were $100,000, then anyone making under $50,000 would be considered living in poverty. The study doesn’t look at purchasing power, health care, access to goods and services only relative income. So we at ThePhalanx.com, decided to do a little research ourselves. According to the US Census Bureau, the median income in the US is approximately $44,000/yr, using the UN methodology that would indicate that anyone earning $22,000/yr or less is considered living in poverty. Now, $22K per year certainly isn’t a stellar salary by any means, but it isn’t exactly poverty either. Now lets take a look at other countries in the study. In Canada the median income is approximately $20,000 US, now that’s not the income for those living in poverty, that’s just the median income. Median income in the UK is about $28,000 US, in Germany its $25,000, in Belgium its $26,000, in Hungary income is a whopping $6300 and in Sweden income is $29,000. In case you haven’t realized the gist of this article, the point is that on average overall income in the US is much higher than in many other “industrialized” nations. Therefore the UN’s statistics are essentially useless. According to the UN a person in the US is living in poverty if they make $22K or less, but if that person were living in Canada with the very same income he’s now middle class? His purchasing power hasn’t increased nor has his income, they only thing that has changed is his residency. These statistics are meaningless, and further demonstrate that statistics can be used to create virtually any scenario you desire. What’s next a UN study saying people who breathe oxygen are more likely to die from cancer, after all everyone who has ever died from cancer has breathed oxygen, so there must be a correlation…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4307745.stm#map
According to a UN study on child poverty, the United States has one of the highest child poverty rates among the world’s wealthiest countries. At first glance this would appear alarming and embarrassing, but then one reads the study and comes to a very different conclusion. According to the study 22% of Americans under the age of 18 live in “relative” poverty. Relative poverty is just that, relative. The UN, however, defines poverty as earning less than 50% of the median income in that country. So for example if the median income in Country X were $100,000, then anyone making under $50,000 would be considered living in poverty. The study doesn’t look at purchasing power, health care, access to goods and services only relative income. So we at ThePhalanx.com, decided to do a little research ourselves. According to the US Census Bureau, the median income in the US is approximately $44,000/yr, using the UN methodology that would indicate that anyone earning $22,000/yr or less is considered living in poverty. Now, $22K per year certainly isn’t a stellar salary by any means, but it isn’t exactly poverty either. Now lets take a look at other countries in the study. In Canada the median income is approximately $20,000 US, now that’s not the income for those living in poverty, that’s just the median income. Median income in the UK is about $28,000 US, in Germany its $25,000, in Belgium its $26,000, in Hungary income is a whopping $6300 and in Sweden income is $29,000. In case you haven’t realized the gist of this article, the point is that on average overall income in the US is much higher than in many other “industrialized” nations. Therefore the UN’s statistics are essentially useless. According to the UN a person in the US is living in poverty if they make $22K or less, but if that person were living in Canada with the very same income he’s now middle class? His purchasing power hasn’t increased nor has his income, they only thing that has changed is his residency. These statistics are meaningless, and further demonstrate that statistics can be used to create virtually any scenario you desire. What’s next a UN study saying people who breathe oxygen are more likely to die from cancer, after all everyone who has ever died from cancer has breathed oxygen, so there must be a correlation…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4307745.stm#map
About Us
- We are Editor
- Location
- Our profile
About the Phalanx Editor:
Previous posts
- Increasing calls to link teacher pay to performanc...
- Communism would have fallen years ago if it weren’...
- Why does Johnny vote Democrat? (The Cult of Depend...
- Lets face it…Bush isn’t the greatest (but he’s not...
- Islamic Terrorists kill dozens in Russia…somehow G...
- The hypocrisy of the Left….
- German leftist takes one last swipe at US
- Why is Johnny so poor? (Report on poverty released...
- Human rights group sides with murderers and rapist...
- A fool’s journey?
Archives
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
Links
- Google News
- So what is pulling a Mussolini?
- Why is Johnny so stupid?
- Why is Johnny so poor?
- Why does Johnny vote Democrat?
- The Quotable Phalanx
- JasonPye.com
- The Liberty Papers
- Atlas Blogged
- Adam Smith Institute
- Slow Turning
- My Right Mind
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Adam Smith Institute
- Hammer of Truth
- The Conservative Voice
- The Patriot Act Research Website
- The Drudge Report
- Nealz Nuze
- Cato Institute
- Balanced Politics
- Americans for Fair Tax
- Alliance for School Choice
- My 4 Cents
- Democratic Underground
- MoveOn.org
- National Education Association
- Democratic Party
- Republican Party
- Westboro Baptist Church
- United Nations
- Kyoto Protocol
- Kelo vs. New London
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
Phalanxian Diatribes:
Other Important links:
Know your enemy (or least those with diametrically opposing points of view):
Earlier Archives:
ATOM 0.3
0 Responses to “UN Study says poverty is relative”
Leave a Reply