SAYING WHAT HAS TO BE SAID...IN TRUE LIBERTARIAN FASHION
Shiite-Sunni negotiations for Iraqi government
Published Wednesday, January 25, 2006 by Editor | E-mail this post
With the Iraqi election results now official, Shiite and Sunni political parties are headed to the negotiating table. Both sides are seeking to forge a coalition government. No party won an outright majority in the Iraqi parliamentary elections, but the Shiites did win a plurality. Because neither the Kurds, the Shiites nor Sunnis won a majority, a coalition government is necessary.
Even before the election results were official, Sunnis protested the results as being fraudulent. Preliminary results had indicated that Sunni aligned parties only won between 19 and 20% of the vote. To the Sunnis, the main backers of Saddam Hussein and the subsequent insurgency, such results were clearly fraudulent because they did not receive an overwhelming majority. The fact of the matter is, however, Sunnis only make up 1/5th of Iraq’s population and thus the results were clearly not fraudulent, as election observers could further attest.
The massive protests, however, were calculated, signaling to Shia and Kurd that if the Sunnis did not receive a significant role in a future Iraqi government there would be ongoing hostilities with the Sunnis. The Shia apparently got the message, as they have bent over backwards to include the Sunnis in power sharing talks, when the Kurds and Shia alone could have forged a coalition to govern Iraq. One of the most volatile points of contention, aside from the murderous rampage of the insurgents is the matter of Iraq’s next Prime Minister. Presumably the Shia may agree to a Sunni leader if the Sunni will agree to stop killing any and everyone who crosses an Iraqi street.
The prospects for Iraqi democracy aren’t promising. The fact that the Sunnis were able to win concessions simply by protesting an obviously legitimate vote, does not foment great trust in representative government, but rather enshrines the mob mentality that the Sunnis have embraced wholeheartedly.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-01-25-iraq_x.htm
Even before the election results were official, Sunnis protested the results as being fraudulent. Preliminary results had indicated that Sunni aligned parties only won between 19 and 20% of the vote. To the Sunnis, the main backers of Saddam Hussein and the subsequent insurgency, such results were clearly fraudulent because they did not receive an overwhelming majority. The fact of the matter is, however, Sunnis only make up 1/5th of Iraq’s population and thus the results were clearly not fraudulent, as election observers could further attest.
The massive protests, however, were calculated, signaling to Shia and Kurd that if the Sunnis did not receive a significant role in a future Iraqi government there would be ongoing hostilities with the Sunnis. The Shia apparently got the message, as they have bent over backwards to include the Sunnis in power sharing talks, when the Kurds and Shia alone could have forged a coalition to govern Iraq. One of the most volatile points of contention, aside from the murderous rampage of the insurgents is the matter of Iraq’s next Prime Minister. Presumably the Shia may agree to a Sunni leader if the Sunni will agree to stop killing any and everyone who crosses an Iraqi street.
The prospects for Iraqi democracy aren’t promising. The fact that the Sunnis were able to win concessions simply by protesting an obviously legitimate vote, does not foment great trust in representative government, but rather enshrines the mob mentality that the Sunnis have embraced wholeheartedly.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-01-25-iraq_x.htm
About Us
- We are Editor
- Location
- Our profile
About the Phalanx Editor:
Previous posts
- What a Conservative Canada means for America…not m...
- Saddam trial session cancelled…and the circus cont...
- Worse day of the year?
- Terry Schiavo revisited…
- The million dollar argument!
- Forget the chocolate…New Orleans should be a "work...
- Syria and Iran circle the wagons…
- What’s going on in France?
- Dems play the Bible card
- Criticism is destabilizing
Archives
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
Links
- Google News
- So what is pulling a Mussolini?
- Why is Johnny so stupid?
- Why is Johnny so poor?
- Why does Johnny vote Democrat?
- The Quotable Phalanx
- JasonPye.com
- The Liberty Papers
- Atlas Blogged
- Adam Smith Institute
- Slow Turning
- My Right Mind
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Adam Smith Institute
- Hammer of Truth
- The Conservative Voice
- The Patriot Act Research Website
- The Drudge Report
- Nealz Nuze
- Cato Institute
- Balanced Politics
- Americans for Fair Tax
- Alliance for School Choice
- My 4 Cents
- Democratic Underground
- MoveOn.org
- National Education Association
- Democratic Party
- Republican Party
- Westboro Baptist Church
- United Nations
- Kyoto Protocol
- Kelo vs. New London
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
Phalanxian Diatribes:
Other Important links:
Know your enemy (or least those with diametrically opposing points of view):
Earlier Archives:
ATOM 0.3
Fa47K23TrQ qti0LVBwAfIZK WR5aDrVCAF9M
vlY68kNAvQeWZ vb5hBYgGbe H7TleZgJ6jKEgq
h7gZ0cpaXm mwwR8Qz7B0At ZROLIx7AnM
8iemEW4jlIo4Q FfbawXozBM iC7XeAuHcSg