SAYING WHAT HAS TO BE SAID...IN TRUE LIBERTARIAN FASHION



Eliminate Electoral College?


E-mail this post



Remember me (?)



All personal information that you provide here will be governed by the Privacy Policy of Blogger.com. More...



Indiana Democratic Senator Evan Bayh (or should we say Blah), who has been frequently mentioned as a candidate for the 2008 nomination (no seriously), has called for the elimination of the Electoral College.

From the moment Bush’s poll numbers began to slide in the months after his second inauguration, the Democrats have wasted no time in jockeying for the political spotlight. Blah’s brief remark about the Electoral College highlights the disconnect between the founders of this country, who feared the political implications of mob rule and the modern Democratic Party, who relies of demagoguery and the ever presence of a sheep like electorate to win elections.

Far from being a clamp on our Republic, the Electoral College was designed as it savior, a savior from mob rule. The absolute last thing this country needs is popular elections. If anything too many ignorant, uneducated, uninformed, easily manipulated individuals are allowed to vote in the first place. Decades ago women and people of color were denied the right to vote…this was certainly inappropriate, but other restrictions such has limiting voting rights to property owners, were based upon a sound principle even if the application was in error. The premise being that property owners had a vested interest in the prosperity and vibrancy of their communities, unlike transients they would make sound electoral decisions to ensure the continued success and prosperity of their communities. The same can be said today. Business owners, hard-workers, home owners, professionals have a vested interest in the continued prosperity of their country and are less influenced by charismatic politicos who promise handouts in exchange for votes…

Critics contend or nation is a democracy and suffrage should be universal…perhaps in theory this is so, but is it democracy when bribery is used as the principle motivator to influence the electorate?

Naturally the entitlement generation has a vested interest in returning leftists to power as they ensure a steady stream of welfare and other entitlement programs, in exchange for continued political support. While many Republicans support conservative demagogue who vow to impose their moral philosophy on the citizenry at large, irrespective of the constitution. The solution is an educated electorate, one which is capable of making rationale independent decisions based upon objective and empirical evidence, most Americans fail miserably in this regard.

Perhaps the citizenship test should be transformed into a suffrage test with sections on civics, history and economics, perhaps then we can consider Blah’s proposal to eliminate the Electoral College. Naturally advocates for the sheep-like will object, arguing any such test would be prejudicial, but as long as we have public schools and libraries, such arguments have no basis in fact, only sloth.
http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/434527.html


5 Responses to “Eliminate Electoral College?”

  1. Anonymous KipEsquire 

    I have long been an advocate of splitting the difference and mandating the use of the District Method of allocating electoral votes, as Maine and Nebraska currently do.

  2. Anonymous marie 

    I'll second that. Nothing like watching the right go into hysteria. LOL.

  3. Anonymous Ray 

    Popular vote or district methods just cater to large population centers. The electoral college makes sure the "flyover states" have their voices heard. I am under the opinion that popular vote would only aid in fraud. I think that our founding fathers, yes I know that is politically incorrect; but the founding fathers knew what they were doing. And another thing, let the states appoint Senators like our constitution originally said. The power of senators has grown and they now have national clout, which was never our founding father's intention.

  4. Anonymous Kira 

    Term limits for Senators, thats what I support. Two terms and you're out - go get a job where you produce something of worth to society.

    But thats sorta like asking congress to reduce their paychecks... Not gonna happen.

  5. Anonymous Ray 

    The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, (chosen by the Legislature thereof,) (The preceding words in parentheses superseded by Amendment XVII, section 1.) for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.

    Repeal the 17th amendment in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

      Convert to boldConvert to italicConvert to link

 


About Us



About the Phalanx Editor:



Previous posts

Archives

Links


ATOM 0.3











Google