SAYING WHAT HAS TO BE SAID...IN TRUE LIBERTARIAN FASHION
“Research” from Harvard rates healthcare systems
Published Wednesday, May 31, 2006 by Editor | E-mail this post
According to a research study from Harvard University, researchers rate the Canadian healthcare system higher than that in the United States. According to these researchers, reports of the inadequacies of Canada’s great social experiment are misleading. If ever it were true that “researchers” will manipulate studies to produce a desired result, this is the case…This hardly empirical telephone survey of US and Canadian adults bases its findings on a stark reality, people in Canada, as a whole are healthier than their American counterparts…so therefore the healthcare system in Canada is superior. A seemingly logical conclusion, but is it?
According to the study, Americans are far more likely to have ailments like diabetes and heart disease. In reality the quality of US healthcare has little if anything to do with diseases like diabetes or heart disease. These diseases are a direct byproduct of lifestyle and eating habits, something for which it is entirely justified to criticize Americans, as this country is home to an ever growing number of fast food junkies, beginning at a very young age. There is no question that Americans are increasingly obese while leading increasingly sedentary lifestyles, a direct result of culture, not a lack of quality healthcare.
Lifestyle choice, however, does not change the fact that healthcare in this country remains one of the best systems in the civilized world and that can be largely attributed to fact that our system differs fundamentally from the Canadian model. Researchers attempted to reconcile this glaring reality by arguing that lack of access to healthcare (for uninsured Americans) accounted for the higher disease rates, as Americans were less likely to receive preventative care. This explanation, however, is sorely lacking. There is no preventive care a doctor can provide in the US or Canada to stop an individual from encouraging fast food or consuming large amounts of sugar, calories and fat, short of affixing a muzzle to their face.
As James Smith, a researcher with the RAND Corporation noted, even among Americans with insurance and access to health care, their was no discernable difference in the disease rate, compared with uninsured Americans. Even if uninsured Americans did have higher disease rates, it wouldn’t necessarily vindicate the Canadian system at the expense of the US model.
Americans who are uninsured are generally those with substantially lower incomes, these individuals with substantially lower incomes (and less education) are far more likely to consume large amounts of fast food and other unhealthy food products, the key lifestyle factor influencing the disease rates in this study.
Clearly the architects of this study have an agenda and that agenda is socialized medicine and therefore it is in their best interest to downplay the obvious and well recognized short comings of Canada’s tax payer sponsored universal health care system, while decrying the American experience. It is also in their best interest, given their motivations, not to explore other casualties that influence health, particularly lifestyle. If this is what passes for research at Harvard Medical, one would hope their physician studied somewhere else.
http://www.suntimes.com/output/health/cst-nws-health31.html
According to the study, Americans are far more likely to have ailments like diabetes and heart disease. In reality the quality of US healthcare has little if anything to do with diseases like diabetes or heart disease. These diseases are a direct byproduct of lifestyle and eating habits, something for which it is entirely justified to criticize Americans, as this country is home to an ever growing number of fast food junkies, beginning at a very young age. There is no question that Americans are increasingly obese while leading increasingly sedentary lifestyles, a direct result of culture, not a lack of quality healthcare.
Lifestyle choice, however, does not change the fact that healthcare in this country remains one of the best systems in the civilized world and that can be largely attributed to fact that our system differs fundamentally from the Canadian model. Researchers attempted to reconcile this glaring reality by arguing that lack of access to healthcare (for uninsured Americans) accounted for the higher disease rates, as Americans were less likely to receive preventative care. This explanation, however, is sorely lacking. There is no preventive care a doctor can provide in the US or Canada to stop an individual from encouraging fast food or consuming large amounts of sugar, calories and fat, short of affixing a muzzle to their face.
As James Smith, a researcher with the RAND Corporation noted, even among Americans with insurance and access to health care, their was no discernable difference in the disease rate, compared with uninsured Americans. Even if uninsured Americans did have higher disease rates, it wouldn’t necessarily vindicate the Canadian system at the expense of the US model.
Americans who are uninsured are generally those with substantially lower incomes, these individuals with substantially lower incomes (and less education) are far more likely to consume large amounts of fast food and other unhealthy food products, the key lifestyle factor influencing the disease rates in this study.
Clearly the architects of this study have an agenda and that agenda is socialized medicine and therefore it is in their best interest to downplay the obvious and well recognized short comings of Canada’s tax payer sponsored universal health care system, while decrying the American experience. It is also in their best interest, given their motivations, not to explore other casualties that influence health, particularly lifestyle. If this is what passes for research at Harvard Medical, one would hope their physician studied somewhere else.
http://www.suntimes.com/output/health/cst-nws-health31.html
About Us
- We are Editor
- Location
- Our profile
About the Phalanx Editor:
Previous posts
- Rash of deaths in Michigan attributed to bad drugs...
- An excuse to riot
- California high schoolers may not “graduate”
- Bush buckles to pressure…
- Putin’s cronies strike again
- Economic growth exceeds 5%
- Speaker objects to FBI raid
- The insecure and their attack on freedom
- Big business in Iraq: Kidnapping
- The Re-Election of Ray Chocolate City Nagin
Archives
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
Links
- Google News
- So what is pulling a Mussolini?
- Why is Johnny so stupid?
- Why is Johnny so poor?
- Why does Johnny vote Democrat?
- The Quotable Phalanx
- JasonPye.com
- The Liberty Papers
- Atlas Blogged
- Adam Smith Institute
- Slow Turning
- My Right Mind
- Reason's Hit and Run
- Adam Smith Institute
- Hammer of Truth
- The Conservative Voice
- The Patriot Act Research Website
- The Drudge Report
- Nealz Nuze
- Cato Institute
- Balanced Politics
- Americans for Fair Tax
- Alliance for School Choice
- My 4 Cents
- Democratic Underground
- MoveOn.org
- National Education Association
- Democratic Party
- Republican Party
- Westboro Baptist Church
- United Nations
- Kyoto Protocol
- Kelo vs. New London
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
Phalanxian Diatribes:
Other Important links:
Know your enemy (or least those with diametrically opposing points of view):
Earlier Archives:
ATOM 0.3
Good post