There is no such thing as gouging
Published Monday, May 01, 2006 by Editor | E-mail this post 

The Democrats and even the Republicans have taken up today’s latest cause celeb: bashing the oil companies. These leftists blame the oil companies for the latest price increases. Why do they do this? Because it is convenient and it is far easier to blame a visible target (ie, the Oil Companies) than to explain to the uneducated masses the reality about gas prices or economic in general.
Gas prices are high for two reasons: decreased supply and increased demand. Not only is the US economy growing but several up and coming economies are growing at record rates, particularly India and China, and thus so too has their demand for oil. This, as Americans continue to drive more in larger vehicles (which is their prerogative). Supply is also limited, not only is the US still reeling from Gulf hurricane damage but refining capacity has not increased in a generation, thus causing a bottle neck in the petroleum supply chain.
These are the principle causes for the current rise in gas prices. The US therefore in order to lower prices and reduce dependency should explore numerous avenues to alleviate this growing problem. Several options present themselves including increasing domestic production, boosting fuel efficiency through readily available technology, such as hybrids and increased development of petroleum alternatives. One thing that will not work is a tax on so-called windfall profits or a Standard Oil style breakup of the nation’s oil companies, whose profit margins are eclipsed by several other industries including software and technology companies, the banking industry and the entertainment industry.
Furthermore there is no such thing as gouging. The free market provides a ready clamp on companies who raise their prices substantially. A company cannot raises prices without a substantial customer fallout and even if that were not the case, businesses and individuals should be free to charge what they feel the market will bare, it is not the duty or the responsibility of the state to intercede on behalf of the ignorant and uneducated.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/world/2006-04-30-euro-gas-usat_x.htm
I suppose then it is ok in a free economic society for competitors to collude and establish what each other will charge at wholesale rates, allowing the retailer to set the final price?
And who is colluding? If there was collusion in the oil market then why were "big oil" profit margins less than 9%. That 9 cents for every dollar of revenue went toward profits. If there was collusion it would exceed 30% like Citibank, Disney or Apple computer, I suppose these firms are colluding as well?
The premise of price gouging implies the existance of a monopoly, no such scenario exists.
Actually only Citibank is high. Exxon is more in line with the other companies. But Citibank making 32 cents on the dollar, three times that of Exxon, where is the outrage? Apple and Disney have been that high in past years.
Citibank Profit Margin 32.25%
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=C
Apple Computer 9.97%
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=AAPL
Disney 8.03%
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=DIS
Exxon Mobil 10.81%
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=xom
And Poor Poor Chevron only made 7.6 cents on the dollar. They should raise prices.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=CVX
Haliburton is at 11.4 cents.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=HAL
To think that pulling something out of the the ground thousands of feet below the surface, I am amazed at how cheap it is. 3 dollars a gallon, please...I have actually heard of people paying $1 dollar for a 20oz. bottle of Dasani water at a vending machine. That translates into $6.40 a gallon for water. Twice a gallon of gas. Drink out of your tap and you might afford gas for your car.