A deadly earthquake has struck in China, preliminary reports indicate that this quake measured at least 7.9 on the Richter scale. We already know that the cyclone that struck Burma was caused by global warming and soon Al Gore will make the obvious connection to the Chinese earthquake.

Though there is the possibility that George Bush is to blame for quake, but then again perhaps it is the Iraq War, or high gas prices, perhaps it is the "record" profits of the oil companies or the evil rich. One thing is for sure Plate Tectonics had nothing to do with it....

Since the dawn of human kind we have been engaged in a never ending struggle for freedom against freedom's oldest enemy: the passion of the few to rule the many.

Nowhere is this tyrannical urge more apparent than Burma, where a brutal military regime has denied the most basic freedom's to its citizens for decades. What kind of world do we live in when tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of people are denied humanitarian aide for no reason whatsover?

Now there is word that the military regime there is impounding what little humanitarian aide that has been allowed in the country. No doubt this has been done so the Junta can later sell these items on the black market. What a disgrace.

There are several ways to deal with a nation’s economy. With the Democratic primary race coming to an end, perhaps it is time to pay closer attention to how are nation's economy will be managed under President Obama [sic].

With Obamanomics you raise taxes.

With Obamanomics you increase deficits with massive increases in government spending and introduce more failed government social problems that serve only to increase poverty and dependency.

With Obamanomics you create disincentives for entrepreneurship and discourage businesses from creating jobs by raising corporate and capital gains taxes.

With Obamanomics you increase energy dependence by limiting exploration and restricting development of energy alternatives, while leaving the nation vulnerable to tyrannical foreign regimes.

With Obamanomics you even admit that with low capital gains taxes come increased revenues, but you raise them anyway because it’s the “fair” thing to do.

With Obamanomics the government works not as an engine for growth and opportunity but as an obstacle for complacency and stagnation…on January 20, 2009 say hello to the 1970s.

After years of global warming which we have been taught that man and man alone was responsible for a 1 degree rise in temperatures over the past century. For years environmental extremist have discounted or ignored all scientific evidence that points to the inescapable fact that global temperature changes occur in cycles and the obvious fact that solar activity as significantly increased in the past two centuries.

Now as global temperatures have remained steady (and even declined in some places) during the last decade, global warming alarmists are on a mad dash to explain away this phenomenon or risk loosing all credibility. Their solution: global warming is just on hold for the next decade or so because of changes in ocean currents and temperatures.

Does this mean that we should disregard the environment and continue to rely on fossil fuels with reckless abandon? Certainly not, even if there were no environmental concerns whatsoever, from a national security standpoint it makes sense to pursue alternative energy sources.

But why are these alarmists so committed to condemning man and man alone for global climate change while continuing to ignore the chief culprit in temperature changes throughout the solar system? Perhaps by ignoring the fact that in the past decade planets like Mars have also experienced rising temperatures they can convince us this farce is a reality.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0501/p25s01-wogi.html